刑事错案论文：论刑事案件证明标准的适用
【中文摘要】刑事案件证明标准是刑事诉讼中定罪量刑活动的核心,其能否正确得到适用攸关刑事案件审判的质量。近年来,发生的一系列冤假错案,其主要的原因就在于刑事诉讼中司法人员对于我国刑事案件证明标准“案件事实清楚、证据确实、充分”的理解和认识出现了偏差。由于该规定过于抽象、缺乏可操作性,司法实践并未形成统一的适用标准,致使司法审判中出现诸多的问题。如本案中仅有被告人的口供,在缺乏证明被告人有罪实物证据的情况下,就被法院认定“案件事实清楚、证据确实、充分”而据以有罪的处罚。这种严重曲解刑事证明标准而作出的不公正裁判,值得我们反思我国刑事案件证明标准适用的现状。本文以案例分析的形式来分析论证我国刑事案件证明标准的适用。即探究冤假错案的发生与刑事案件证明标准的适用不当有着天然的联系的。首先,通过分析介绍“赵作海案”的案情,来引出我国刑事诉讼证明标准存在的问题。此部分主要论证了刑事案件定罪证明标准存在的问题,即我国法律并没有明确规定刑事案件定罪的证明标准,“案件事实清楚、证据确实、充分”的刑事证明标准,是从相关法律规定中总结出来的。而且司法实践中对于该证明标准的理解和适用也是莫衷一是。对于刑事证据是否达到确实充分,据以认定案件事实清楚的证据取得是否符合法定的程序,由此给法官形成的内心确信程度等问题的考量,司法人员也是因人而异。此外,分析论证了我国“留有余地判死缓”刑事政策在赵作海案中被司法人员严重误
解。其次,根据刑事案件证明标准的适用引申出了死刑案件与非死刑案件证明标准的辨析,依次论述了我国死刑案件与非死刑案件在证明标准中的的现状与不足,并在此基础上论证了两者的联系与区别。此外,分析了我国刑事案件定罪与量刑证明标准一体化存在的不足以及两者分离的必要性。最后,分析了非法证据排除在我国刑事案件证明标准中存在的意义。
【英文摘要】Standard of proof in criminal cases is the conviction and sentencing of criminal activities in the core of its ability to get the correct application of the quality of the criminal trial and death.In recent years, a series of enemy miscarriage occurred, the main reason is that the
judiciary in criminal proceedings, the standard of proof for criminal cases in China, “facts of the case clear, the evidence is reliable and sufficient” understanding and knowledge has gone wrong.As the provisions are too abstract, the lack of maneuverability, the formation of a unified judicial practice does not apply to standard, resulting in the emergence of a number of justice iues.As in the present, only the defendant’s confeion, in the absence of physical evidence to prove guilt of the accused’s case, the court held that the “facts of the case clear, the evidence is reliable and sufficient,”
according to the guilty punished.This serious distortion of the
criminal standard of proof made unjust judge, we should reflect on our standard of proof applicable in criminal cases the status quo.In this paper, the form of case studies to analyze the argument of China’s standard of proof applicable in criminal cases.That explore the enemy and the occurrence of erroneous standard of proof applicable in criminal cases there is a natural link improper.First, by analyzing the introduction, “Zhao Zuohai case,” the facts of the case to lead to China’s criminal standard of proof problems.This part of the main argument of the standard of proof in criminal cases, the problems conviction that our law does not clearly defined standard of proof in criminal cases, convictions, “facts of the case clear, the evidence is reliable and sufficient,” the criminal standard of proof is summarized from the relevant legal provisions out.And judicial practice, the standard of proof for the interpretation and application is no
agreement.Whether for criminal evidence is ample, according to the facts of the case made clear evidence of compliance with statutory procedures, which form the heart sure to judge the extent of the problem considered, the judiciary also vary.In addition, the analysis and appraisal of China’s “leave room for the sentence reprieve” Zhao Zuohai criminal policy in the
case of judicial officers was a serious
misunderstanding.Secondly, according to the applicable
standard of proof in criminal cases come out of death penalty cases and non-capital cases the standard of proof of Analysis, followed by discuion of China’s death penalty cases and non-capital cases in the standard of proof and lack of status, and argues on this basis and differences between the two.In addition, analysis of China’s conviction and sentencing in criminal cases the standard of proof and lack of integration between the separate existence of the need.Finally, the
analysis of the illegal evidence exclusion in our standard of proof in criminal cases, the meaning of existence.【关键词】刑事错案 刑事证明标准 非法证据排除
【英文关键词】Criminal InjusticeCriminal Proof StandardIllegal Evidence Exclusion 【备注】在线加我索购全文 ：1-3-9-9.38-8-4-8
同时提供论文发表委托服务和一对一论文写作指导。
【目录】论刑事案件证明标准的适用
4-
59-10Abstract5-6序言8-9中文摘要
一、案情介绍
（一）
二、该案证明标准适用中存在的问题10-1
4该案在定罪问题上没有达到法定证明标准10-121.评析我国
刑事案件定罪的证明标准10
10-1
111-122.对赵作海案的证据评价3.赵作海案中影响证明标准适用的因素分析
（二） 该案“留有余地判处死刑”降低了死刑适用的
三、对证明标准适用的进一步思考证明标准12-14
14-20
14-17
（一） 死刑与非死刑案件的证明标准辨析1.分离说14-152.统一说15-17
（二） 定罪与量刑证明标准的分离17-18
体化的不足17
17-18
18-20
23-24 1.定罪与量刑证明标准一2.定罪与量刑证明标准分离的必要性
（三） 非法证据排除在证明标准适用中的意义结语20-21参考文献21-23致谢
