In the reading paage, the author argues that working in a team has many advantages.However, the profeor\'s lecture casts doubt on the reading paage by a specific example.
First, The author in the reading paage argues that workers can be rewarding.The point disagrees with the statement demonstrated by the lecturer that even though they do a good job, they will not benefit from the team, because no names are appreciated and the glory belongs to the whole team.As a result, workers almost don\'t contribute to the team project.
According to the author that in a team, there is more knowledge and
resources, therefore, more creative solutions will be built.What\'s more, the whole team can accomplish the work more quickly.This directly contradicts what the listening material indicates.Because it can take a long time to make a consensus and it will make a few meetings to make an agreement.
Finally, someone is influential, if he or she thinks one solutionisn’t well, then the solution will not be discued, and if he or she thinks one solution is creative, then although it has shortages, they will be ignored.As a result, the project done by the whole team goes very slow.
In a nut shell, based on the discuions demonstrated above, we can clearly see that the points made in the lecture differ from those made in the reading.
