发展经济重要还是环保重要
China is a developing country, and in the socialist modernization drive in the proce of economic development and environmental protection often conflict.We need to protect the environment of economic development.First, we must protect the environment of economic development is the eential requirement of economic development.Economic development is to improve people\'s living standards.China\'s economic development is to solve the people\'s increasing material and cultural needs.Born Out of China\'s semi-colonial and semi-feudal agricultural country.Weak economic foundation, a low level of industrialization, in the course of economic development and economic development in the protection of the environment prevailing contradictions.Protection of the environment including the protection of people\'s living environment and the natural environment.Exist in the city economic development especially industrial development on the lives of the residents have a negative impact on the situation in the rural areas there is more damage the natural environment and ecological environment.The purpose of economic development is to improve people\'s living standards, and the proce of development because of damage to the environment affect people\'s lives, and contrary to the original intent of economic development.
Second, we must protect the environment of economic development is the strategy of sustainable development requirements.The environment we live in, our future generations have to live here.We destroy the environment of economic development, some damage is irreparable, the future generations of crime.Now countries around the world have attached great importance to the strategy of sustainable development research, vigorously develop the green industry, and pollution-free industries.China is a civilization with a long history and a big country in the proce of economic development should also attach importance to environmental protection, to leave our future generations a better living space.
Third, we must protect the environment of economic development is a natural law requirements.The proce of economic development, if the serious damage to the natural environment, then we will be natural to be severely punished.Major floods caused damage to the environment are the inevitable result.In the floods in the consumption of manpower, material and financial fear of the expense of the environment more than the fruits of economic development.The laws of nature is mercile, who violated it who will be its revenge.We must attach great importance to the proce of economic development in the protection of the natural environment and social environment.
Fourth, economic development and resolve conflicts protection of the environment is the fundamental way to further economic development.Development is the last word.We can not lose the economic development and the protection of the environment, not because of the ground to protect the environment in the development of economic iues before the vine.Way is economic development.It is neceary to strengthen environmental awarene and use our brains.Economic development and environmental protection are not necearily contradictory.On the contrary, economic development should promote environmental protection.Extensive multi-level high-technology development, industrial pollution-free green.The development of the economy, the prosperity of the country, the level of development of productive forces, people conquering nature\'s ability to transform nature will be further strengthened.People not only have the ability to protect the environment, but also the environment can be rebuilt.Desert will be transformed into farmland.Economic development is the way to protect the environment.
Fifth, the whole society should attach importance to developing the economy and protecting the environment.At present many places, there are many sectors of the expense of the environment and developing the economy.This is historical and practical reasons, but look at the use of the development iue, people will be even more profound understanding of the economic development proce of the importance of environmental protection, leaders at all levels should establish environmental awarene, from the strategic height of the development of knowledge economy and the protection of the environment , based on the overall situation into consideration in the protection of the environment at the same time vigorously developing the economy and improving the people\'s standard of living.
In short, protecting the environment and economic development are not contradictory.In the proce of economic development must pay attention to protecting the environment.
Because pollution will, of course, cause harm.Earth is a circle of the world.In fact, there is no absolute on the planet waste.All things can be recycled.But human intervention so that the deviation in this cycle, there has been not the cycle of things.For example, the Styrofoam boxes years ago.If this is the case, then, is a vicious circle.That the Earth\'s resources will be consumed End.Well, the earth dangerous.Protective measures should be as close to the Earth\'s self-cycle.Prevention should do more \"farsightedne\" and not always stare in the economic goals.Should be from the perspective of the humanities and natural starting
译文：我国是发展中国家，在社会主义现代化建设过程中发展经济与保护环境时常发生冲突。我们发展经济必须保护环境。
一、发展经济必须保护环境是发展经济的本质要求。发展经济是为了提高人民的生活水平。在我国发展经济是为了解决人民日益增长的物质文化需求。我国脱胎于半殖民地、半封建的农业国。经济基础薄弱，工业化程度低，在经济发展过程中发展经济与保护环境的矛盾普遍存在。保护环境包括保护人民群众生活环境和自然环境。在城市存在发展经济尤其是发展工业对居民生活产生不良影响的情况，在农村更是存在破坏自然环境和生态环境的问题。发展经济的目的是为了提高人民生活水平，而发展过程中因破坏环境影响人民生活，违背了发展经济的本意。
二、发展经济必须保护环境是可持续发展战略的要求。我们生活的环境，我们的子孙后代也要在这里生活。我们发展经济破坏了环境，有些破坏是无法弥补的，是对子孙后代的犯罪。现在世界各国都已高度重视可持续发展战略的研究，大力发展绿色工业，无公害产业。我国是具有悠久历史和文明的大国，在发展经济过程中更应该重视环境保护，为子孙后代留下美好的生活空间。
三、发展经济必须保护环境是自然规律的要求。经济发展过程中，如果自然环境受到了严重损害，那么我们将受到自然的严厉惩罚。重大的洪涝灾害都是破坏环境造成的必然结果。在抗洪救灾中消耗的人力、物力、财务恐怕已超过了牺牲环境的经济发展成果。自然规律是无情的，谁侵犯了它谁将受到它的报复。我们必须高度重视发展经济过程中保护自然环境和社会环境。
四、解决发展经济与保护环境矛盾的根本出路在于进一步发展经济。发展是硬道理。我们不能因为发展经济而失去对环境的保护，更不能因为以保护环境为由在发展经济问题上畏缩不前。出路还在于发展经济。要加强环境保护意识，开动脑筋。发展经济与保护环境并不是必然矛盾。相反，发展经济应该促进环境保护。广泛多发展科技水平高，无公害的绿色工业。经济发展了，国家富强了，生产
力发展水平提高了，人们征服自然改造自然的能力会进一步得到加强。人们不但有能力保护环境，还可以改造环境。将沙漠改造成良田。发展经济是保护环境的出路。
五、全社会都应该重视发展经济与保护环境的问题。目前许多地方、许多部门都存在着牺牲环境而发展经济的情况。这有历史和现实原因，但用发展的眼光看问题，人们会更加深刻认识发展经济过程中保护环境的重要性，各级领导都应该树立环保意识，从战略的高度认识发展经济与保护环境的问题，立足全局，统筹兼顾，在保护好环境的同时大力发展经济，提高人民的生活水平。
总之，保护环境与发展经济是不矛盾的。发展经济过程中必须注意保护环境。
因为污染当然会造成危害。地球是一个循环的世界。其实，在地球上没有绝对的废弃物。所有的东西都可以循环利用。但是人类的介入，使这个循环出现了偏差，出现了不能循环的东西。比如早些年的发泡饭盒。如果这样的话，那么，就是一个恶性循环。这样地球的资源就会被消耗完。那么，地球就危险了。保护的措施应该是尽量的接近地球的自我循环。预防应该是多做些“远视”，不要老是盯在经济目标上。应该从人文和自然的角度出发
Which should receive priority in china ，economic growth or environmental protection？
Theoretical cliche
正方一辩：从人类发展的终极目标看，我们要彻底地解决环境问题，必须要标本兼治。要治本，必须优先发展经济，从根本上优化经济结构堵住产生环境问题的源头，要治标，同样要优先发展经济，为解决眼前的环境问题提供技术、资金等支持，只有这样，才能为人类生存和发展提供环境保障。
From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to addre both the symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems thoroughly.To effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems；To take temporary solution，we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems.Only in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and development.
反方一辩：经济发展是指社会能够提供丰裕的商品来改善人类的物质生活,环境保护则是采取一定的政策措施来保护生态平衡。经济要发展意味着企业需要更多的厂房与原材料来保障商品的供应——那便存在一个问题：自然分给人类的土地与原材料是有限,经济优先发展就一定会侵占原本不属于人类的自然资源。
The economic development refers to society can provide abundant commodity to improve human material life; environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance.economic development means that companies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goods——then there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human.
二辩盘问 Two debate questioned
反方二辩：请问对方二辩，经济是一时之事，环境是万代之事，哪个重要？经济发展慢了，人们还可以吃到饭，环境没了，还能生存吗？
My fellow debaters ，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice; how can we still survive if there is no environment.
正方二辩：不好意思对方辩友，恐怕我们今天讨论的重点是优先权。并不是说经济优先就不搞环保了，只是环保处于较次的位置，跟中国现状一样，政策虽然说要重视环保，但一般县区还是经济发展优先的，也就有资本的大城市才比较重视搞环保，相信大家心知肚明
Sorry, I\'m afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior position .Just like the present China, although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.
反方二辩：请问正方三辩，如果发展经济优先的话，很可能造成环境成本大于经济效益的情况，这样的经济是发展还是倒退？
Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely to cause the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?
正方三辩：这种情况确实有存在，但并不是每时每刻都存在。各个行业情况不同，我们不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，这种情况下经济效益是负的，那我们改行环境保护优先，就能转亏为盈？我不这么觉得。
This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different; we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don\'t think so.
正方二辩： 我们知道环境的保护是预防为主，防治结合，而预防和治理都要依靠技术的发展，那请问对方二辩，如果没有强有力的经济基础支持科学技术发展，那么以科技为支撑的环保从何谈起呢？
We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.
反方二辩：你的问题未免抽象了点。科技发展无止尽，经济发展也没尽头，什么时候算得上是“强有力”呢？但是环境保护是迫在眉睫，耽误不起。
Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlely, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong\"? But environmental protection is imminent, which can\'t afford to delay.
正方二辩：请问反方三辩，经济发展是让人们享受到丰富的生活内容，包括衣食住行娱乐，这难道不是现在社会上人们的普遍愿望吗？ Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic neceities and entertainment, isn\'t it now the people\'s universal desire?
反方三辩：人们喜欢的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人们更倾向于在一个既能享受到生活乐趣，同时又是一个健康和谐自然的环境中生存。
People`s expectation is not necearily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happine, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment
自由辩论
正方一辩：请问对方辩友，原始社会的人类祖先们环境保护工作做得可谓好了吧，而他们
经济发展很落后，所所以才一直过着钻木取火、茹毛饮血的生活，按你们的意思我们应该回归这种生活吗？
Excuse me, my fellow friends .In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?反方一辩：人类祖先确实需要发展经济，但若是在这个过程中砍完了森林，污染了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也无法发展下去了。我想问的是，核电站是经济发展的产物，但众所周知，几次核电站的泄漏带来了环境的极度恶化，请问你怎么看？
Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this proce, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the outcome of the economic development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it?
正方二辩：首先，我方并没有承诺经济发展就一定会破坏到环境；其次，对方所说的情况只是凤毛麟角；第三，核电站泄漏是科技不力，而经济是科学研究的基础。
First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment; second, the situation you said is only rare; third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But economy is the foundation of scientific research.
反方二辩：但是核电站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么办？没有了这些，我们的生活怎么办？你愿意生活在核电站附近，还是一片山清水秀之间？
But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries?
正方三辩：但是对方辩友请注意，核电站的建造，正是为了千千万万人类的生活用电得到满足。有了电，我们的机器可以运作，生产可以兴起，环境总会有办法弥补，我也想问，你愿意生活在两小时停一次电的地方还是用电无忧之处？
Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people\'s living power.With the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.
反方三辩：你的意思是破坏了环境然后再去弥补。为什么要先污染后治理？为什么要兜这么大一个圈子呢？而且我国的经济建设里程已经证明，先污染后治理是错的，行不通的。
You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won\'t work.
正方四辩：我不得不说我方真冤枉。是你给的前提，说核电站泄漏了，严重污染了环境，而我方坚信是可以挽救的。而且事实上，包括核电站在内的很多工业厂子，都种有青草绿树，他们在搞经济的同时，并没有放弃环境的保护。
I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green gra and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.
反方四辩：但是仅仅不放弃就可以吗？再怎么注意也无法保证无污染，这样日积月累下来，依然会是一片惨状。必须把环境保护放在第一位，每个工厂都严抓，才能从根本上阻止环境的恶化。
But only does not give up poible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening fundamentally.
正方三辩：对方辩友请从事实出发，经济发展必然会付出代价，我们已经在努力使代价降到最低。
Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.
反方三辩：降低应该有个标准吧，这不是你我能定的，是自然环境定的，等到他揭示这个标准时，只怕为时已晚了。
Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.
四辩总结
正方四辩：首先，我是一个支持环保的人，拥有一个健康的生态环境是可持续发展得以进行的前提。但是，如果一味的保护环境，而忽视经济发展，那么对于经济的发展不利，对于人们生活水平的提高也同样不利。同时，我也必须强调，经济发展绝对不是破坏环境，那样的发展，也是违背自然规律的。在发展经济的同时，我们要兼顾治理环境，才是当今可持续发展经济的理念。
First, I am a supporter of environmental protection.Having a healthy ecological environment is the premise of the sustainable development.But, if we blindly protect the environment, and neglect the economic development, then it has not any good for both economical development and people living standard.At the same time, I must stre that the economic development not necearily destroy the environment, such development also violates the natural law.While develop economy, we must give dual attention to the environmental protection, this is the concept of sustainable economic development.
反方四辩：过去的发展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式，结果呢，环境问题突出，局部地区已经到了威胁生存的程度：再者，先污染后治理的模式不但成本高，而且治理效果也不理想，处于一种被动的境地。因此，必须从源头开始防止污染，也就是发展过程首先考虑对环境的影响，只有这样，才能有望在将来解决环境问题。
The past development road is a management-after-pollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival; Furthermore, management-after-pollution pattern not only costs higher, but also is inefficient, sometimes in a paive position.Therefore, we must start to prevent pollution from the source, that is to consider the poible influence on the environment during the development proce.Only in this way, can we except to solve environment problems in the future.
毛概调查报告——热点剖析：发展经济重要,还是保护环境重要？（推荐）
