Damage to environment is an inevitable consequence of the improvement in the standard of living.To what degree do you agree or disagree to this position?
Over the last several years, with the remarkableliving standard, great changes have been taken place in our environment.There is a growing worldwide awarene of weather the environment problems is an ineluctableproblem of the proce or not.As to hold this matter I hold the opinion that it is aconsequence of the development of living level, but not neceary it is inevitable to break theenvironment.
Over the last several years, with the remarkable improvement of living standard, great changes have been taking place in our environment.There is a growing worldwide awarene of weather the environment damage is an ineluctable problem accompanied with the proce of human society development or not.Here I hold the opinion that the damage of environment these days
At the beginning, countries advance their economic with non-renewable resources.It is fleetly and effectively to earn the economic benefits but wreak havoc on nature resources.After a period of time this money-worshipping method put a stain on the resources.It is obviously that people give priority to the rise the standard of living before the eential environment.Some people claim that every thing opens up a poibility of two sides even the actual findings and potential benefits are extremely limited to ordinary people on the short term in particular.
At the beginning, countries advance their economic by overusingnon-renewable resources.It is fast and effectiveto earn the economic benefitin this waybut it will also exhaust nature
resources.After a period of time this money-worshipping method put a strain on the resources? It is obviously that people give priority to the rise the standard of living but not the eential
environment.Some people claimed that everything opens up a poibility of two sides even the actual findings and potential benefits are extremely limited to ordinary people on the short term in particular.
On the contrary, adversaries claim that improving the livingstandardalso contact improving the environment.The exploration of satellite has positive impacts on our daily life.E.g.monitoringsatellites save lives by providing advance warning of adverse environment condition.Besides rapid updating of science and technology, they help to acquire new source to mitigate the energy crisis.Technology is an investment into the future, since it may find new way for human to solve the problem of decrease resources.Meanwhile, government is the supervisor and conductor in this society; it can bring in strong legislation with effective enforcement such as giving a Greenpeace.
On the contrary, some people claimed that improving the living standard also contact improving the environment.The exploration of satellite has many positive impacts on our daily life, for
examplemonitoring satellites are able to save lives by providing theadvance warning of adverse environment condition.Rapid updating of science and technology helps people to find outnew sources to mitigate the energy crisis.Technology is an investment for the future, since it may find new way for human to solve the problem of decrease resources.
Judging from the evidence offered above, we could reasonably come to the conclusion that damage to environment is definitely not the inevitable consequence of advanced living standard.To achieve that goal of solving environmentproblem we must pay morestrive.
Judging from the evidence offered above, we could reasonably come to the conclusion that
damage to environment is definitely not the inevitable consequence of advanced living standard.However,to achieve that goal of solving environment problem we must pay more strive on it.Whether the damage of environment is the inevitable consequence of the improvement of living standard has been widely argued for the obvious fact that the natural environment are getting worse and worse in the last several years.The problem of environment is even more serious in many rapidly developing countries.In my opinion, the damage of environment in these days is mainly caused by the development of the human society, but it is not inevitable.
In the beginning, environment damage is a consequence of the human development because factories make waste as well as products.The wastes released into the environment because pollution and many of those can hardly been removed.In some places, people advance their
economic by selling the non-renewable resource, such as oil, coal and metal.It is a faster and easy way to earn the economic benefit but the unlimited, unregulated mining often results in serious
environmental problems.The forest which had covered the mine was destroyed; a maive amount of dust was generated and spread miles away from the mine.In addition, as they are
non-renewable source, we will never have them again once they are exhausted.
